MCTS SQL Server 2005

What scares me about the 70-431 exam is the huge amount of complicated
T-SQL commands. Look at the syntax of any T-SQL command with all its
options; many many options, how can I remember them. Do I need to
remember all these instructions for the exam. Please let me know.If you learn it, you don't have to remember it :) On top of that, I think it
is an easier test than 7.0 or 2000. Just practice and understand why and you
will be fine.
--
Jason Massie
www: http://statisticsio.com
rss: http://feeds.feedburner.com/statisticsio
"lrantisi" <lrantisi@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:b833a574-8d18-4b79-9498-b84df470ec14@.e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> What scares me about the 70-431 exam is the huge amount of complicated
> T-SQL commands. Look at the syntax of any T-SQL command with all its
> options; many many options, how can I remember them. Do I need to
> remember all these instructions for the exam. Please let me know.|||Agree!
70-431 was mutch easier that 70-228/70-229 and 70-028/029
but the follow ups 70-441/70-442 and 70-443/70-444
are more complicated that SQL2000 or SQL7 exams
what is good - You can optain quite easyly MCTS SQL2005
What I can recomment - for repeating, self training and getting the point of
real tests - go thorugh some preparation provider material (measureup or
something like)
But the main point is - You dont know exact syntacs or exact options for
every single thing (I don't know for example and in real life BOL is always
opened on my hand, during work, during traiining etc - unfortunately not
allowed during exams :))
You have to know and understand the principles of things. The structure, the
goal, the reason and the target of sql sentences.
As I remember - there wasn't so much in 431 about performance stuff
With bests
Henn
PS! Let me know when You pass the 431 :)
"jason" <jason-r3move@.statisticsio.com> kirjutas sõnumis
news:93A5B69C-EA5B-4269-9C70-6D3B7EDE0E5F@.microsoft.com...
> If you learn it, you don't have to remember it :) On top of that, I think
> it is an easier test than 7.0 or 2000. Just practice and understand why
> and you will be fine.
> --
> Jason Massie
> www: http://statisticsio.com
> rss: http://feeds.feedburner.com/statisticsio
> "lrantisi" <lrantisi@.gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:b833a574-8d18-4b79-9498-b84df470ec14@.e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>> What scares me about the 70-431 exam is the huge amount of complicated
>> T-SQL commands. Look at the syntax of any T-SQL command with all its
>> options; many many options, how can I remember them. Do I need to
>> remember all these instructions for the exam. Please let me know.
>

MCTS SQL Server 2005

What scares me about the 70-431 exam is the huge amount of complicated
T-SQL commands. Look at the syntax of any T-SQL command with all its
options; many many options, how can I remember them. Do I need to
remember all these instructions for the exam. Please let me know.
If you learn it, you don't have to remember it On top of that, I think it
is an easier test than 7.0 or 2000. Just practice and understand why and you
will be fine.
Jason Massie
www: http://statisticsio.com
rss: http://feeds.feedburner.com/statisticsio
"lrantisi" <lrantisi@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:b833a574-8d18-4b79-9498-b84df470ec14@.e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> What scares me about the 70-431 exam is the huge amount of complicated
> T-SQL commands. Look at the syntax of any T-SQL command with all its
> options; many many options, how can I remember them. Do I need to
> remember all these instructions for the exam. Please let me know.
|||Agree!
70-431 was mutch easier that 70-228/70-229 and 70-028/029
but the follow ups 70-441/70-442 and 70-443/70-444
are more complicated that SQL2000 or SQL7 exams
what is good - You can optain quite easyly MCTS SQL2005
What I can recomment - for repeating, self training and getting the point of
real tests - go thorugh some preparation provider material (measureup or
something like)
But the main point is - You dont know exact syntacs or exact options for
every single thing (I don't know for example and in real life BOL is always
opened on my hand, during work, during traiining etc - unfortunately not
allowed during exams )
You have to know and understand the principles of things. The structure, the
goal, the reason and the target of sql sentences.
As I remember - there wasn't so much in 431 about performance stuff
With bests
Henn
PS! Let me know when You pass the 431
"jason" <jason-r3move@.statisticsio.com> kirjutas snumis
news:93A5B69C-EA5B-4269-9C70-6D3B7EDE0E5F@.microsoft.com...
> If you learn it, you don't have to remember it On top of that, I think
> it is an easier test than 7.0 or 2000. Just practice and understand why
> and you will be fine.
> --
> Jason Massie
> www: http://statisticsio.com
> rss: http://feeds.feedburner.com/statisticsio
> "lrantisi" <lrantisi@.gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:b833a574-8d18-4b79-9498-b84df470ec14@.e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
sql

MaxInsertCommitSize not found in SQL Server Destination

Hi,

I have installed SQL Server 2005 Service Pack 1 installed. I could see that from running @.@.Version command.

i am not able to find the MaxInsertCommitSize custom property in my sql server destination in SSIS packages.

is there anything specific i need to do to see that.

--

Mahadevan H

That property is not on the SQL Server Destination, it's on the OLE DB Destination.|||

Hi Jwelch,

thank you for your reply. But please refer the following URL from MSDN. It says it is the property of the SQL Destination.

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms135971.aspx#sqlserver

Regards

Mahadevan H

|||

h_mahadev wrote:

Hi Jwelch,

thank you for your reply. But please refer the following URL from MSDN. It says it is the property of the SQL Destination.

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms135971.aspx#sqlserver

Regards

Mahadevan H

The documentation is correct, it is there. I've pulled a SQL Server Destination into my dataflow, hit F4, and I can see the property in the properties pane.

I'm confused as to why you think it doesn't exist?

-Jamie

|||

Hi,

when i do the same thin i am not getting that property. I am wondering why.

Regards

Mahadevan H

|||

What service pack have you got installed. I am on SP1.

-Jamie

|||SP1 only.|||

h_mahadev wrote:

Hi Jwelch,

thank you for your reply. But please refer the following URL from MSDN. It says it is the property of the SQL Destination.

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms135971.aspx#sqlserver

Regards

Mahadevan H

Doh! You are absolutely correct. And, when I rechecked, it is showing up for me as well, just as Jamie mentioned.

If you right-clcik the task, choose Advanced Editor, go to the Component Properties tab, and look in the sction for Custom Properties, does it show up there?

MAXFILE Size won't Change

SQL Server 2005 64 Bit Enterprise Edition.

When I run the the following command I get command completed successfully.

ALTER DATABASE Apollo_Replication
MODIFY FILE (NAME = Apollo_Replication_log,
MAXSIZE = 'UNLIMITED')

However

when I look at the database properties the file growth is still

restricted to 2 GB. I even tried to edit the property through

SSMS. Same results...It looks like it saves ok but when I go back

in... no change.
The only thing unique about the db is it is the subscriber from an Oracle publisher.
Has anyone seen this little feature before?Are you sure it is 2GB and not 2TB? The architectural limit for each log file is 2TB.|||oops it is 2 TB. But why can't I change the properties to unlimited file growth? My current size is 31 GB. I am trying to shrink the file back down to a reasonable size and change the properties.|||

UNLIMITED is never really unlimited. For log files it is 2TB. For data files it is actually 16TB. Its just a reporting issue on what the UI or report considers to be "unlimited."