Dear all,
After our team has upgraded backup software of one server to "Veritas
BackupExec 9.1",
We found our routine SQL backup jobs (as part of our maintenance plan) fail
on it.
From our investigation, we suspect it is caused by the MDAC 2.8 installed
with BackupExec 9.1
The problem seems already documented in microsoft support article :
http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...kb;en-us;827452
However, as our company has not join MS support service, I have no formal
channel
to receive hot fix for the MDAC.
(Actually the article suggest to update dbnmpntw.dll to a version after
09-17-2003 (2000.85.1022.42),
but it is already 2 years but still no MDAC 2.8 SP1 out there, which is
quite disappointed)
Can anyone give me a hand ?
Thanks for anyone's kind help in advance ... EricSorry, I forget to mention my environment.
Our server is running Win2000 Std Server (English) with SP3.
"Eric Fung" <Pls type eric.fung plus @.hld.com> bl
news:uQ$IZf0PFHA.244@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl g...
> Dear all,
> After our team has upgraded backup software of one server to "Veritas
> BackupExec 9.1",
> We found our routine SQL backup jobs (as part of our maintenance plan)
fail
> on it.
> From our investigation, we suspect it is caused by the MDAC 2.8 installed
> with BackupExec 9.1
> The problem seems already documented in microsoft support article :
> http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...kb;en-us;827452
> However, as our company has not join MS support service, I have no formal
> channel
> to receive hot fix for the MDAC.
> (Actually the article suggest to update dbnmpntw.dll to a version after
> 09-17-2003 (2000.85.1022.42),
> but it is already 2 years but still no MDAC 2.8 SP1 out there, which
is
> quite disappointed)
> Can anyone give me a hand ?
> Thanks for anyone's kind help in advance ... Eric
>|||Eric wrote on Tue, 12 Apr 2005 18:10:10 +0800:
> However, as our company has not join MS support service, I have no formal
> channel
> to receive hot fix for the MDAC.
You don't need to "join" the support service. Just ring the service number
for your country, explain the issue, and they send you a location to
download the fix from and a password to access the download. So long as it's
an issue covered by the article that requires a file(s) from MS support they
won't charge.
Dan|||Dear Daniel,
Thanks a lot for your advice, I will try.
Eric
"Daniel Crichton" <msnews@.worldofspack.co.uk> bl
news:udnoPP3PFHA.2584@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl g...
> Eric wrote on Tue, 12 Apr 2005 18:10:10 +0800:
>
formal[vbcol=seagreen]
> You don't need to "join" the support service. Just ring the service number
> for your country, explain the issue, and they send you a location to
> download the fix from and a password to access the download. So long as
it's
> an issue covered by the article that requires a file(s) from MS support
they
> won't charge.
> Dan
>sql
Showing posts with label latest. Show all posts
Showing posts with label latest. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 28, 2012
MDAC 2.8 seems cause SQL backup fail, can anyone send us a MDAC 2.8 latest hotfix ?
Dear all,
After our team has upgraded backup software of one server to "Veritas
BackupExec 9.1",
We found our routine SQL backup jobs (as part of our maintenance plan) fail
on it.
From our investigation, we suspect it is caused by the MDAC 2.8 installed
with BackupExec 9.1
The problem seems already documented in microsoft support article :
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;827452
However, as our company has not join MS support service, I have no formal
channel
to receive hot fix for the MDAC.
(Actually the article suggest to update dbnmpntw.dll to a version after
09-17-2003 (2000.85.1022.42),
but it is already 2 years but still no MDAC 2.8 SP1 out there, which is
quite disappointed)
Can anyone give me a hand ?
Thanks for anyone's kind help in advance ... Eric
Sorry, I forget to mention my environment.
Our server is running Win2000 Std Server (English) with SP3.
"Eric Fung" <Pls type eric.fung plus @.hld.com> bl
news:uQ$IZf0PFHA.244@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl g...
> Dear all,
> After our team has upgraded backup software of one server to "Veritas
> BackupExec 9.1",
> We found our routine SQL backup jobs (as part of our maintenance plan)
fail
> on it.
> From our investigation, we suspect it is caused by the MDAC 2.8 installed
> with BackupExec 9.1
> The problem seems already documented in microsoft support article :
> http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;827452
> However, as our company has not join MS support service, I have no formal
> channel
> to receive hot fix for the MDAC.
> (Actually the article suggest to update dbnmpntw.dll to a version after
> 09-17-2003 (2000.85.1022.42),
> but it is already 2 years but still no MDAC 2.8 SP1 out there, which
is
> quite disappointed)
> Can anyone give me a hand ?
> Thanks for anyone's kind help in advance ... Eric
>
|||Eric wrote on Tue, 12 Apr 2005 18:10:10 +0800:
> However, as our company has not join MS support service, I have no formal
> channel
> to receive hot fix for the MDAC.
You don't need to "join" the support service. Just ring the service number
for your country, explain the issue, and they send you a location to
download the fix from and a password to access the download. So long as it's
an issue covered by the article that requires a file(s) from MS support they
won't charge.
Dan
|||Dear Daniel,
Thanks a lot for your advice, I will try.
Eric
"Daniel Crichton" <msnews@.worldofspack.co.uk> bl
news:udnoPP3PFHA.2584@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl g...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Eric wrote on Tue, 12 Apr 2005 18:10:10 +0800:
formal
> You don't need to "join" the support service. Just ring the service number
> for your country, explain the issue, and they send you a location to
> download the fix from and a password to access the download. So long as
it's
> an issue covered by the article that requires a file(s) from MS support
they
> won't charge.
> Dan
>
After our team has upgraded backup software of one server to "Veritas
BackupExec 9.1",
We found our routine SQL backup jobs (as part of our maintenance plan) fail
on it.
From our investigation, we suspect it is caused by the MDAC 2.8 installed
with BackupExec 9.1
The problem seems already documented in microsoft support article :
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;827452
However, as our company has not join MS support service, I have no formal
channel
to receive hot fix for the MDAC.
(Actually the article suggest to update dbnmpntw.dll to a version after
09-17-2003 (2000.85.1022.42),
but it is already 2 years but still no MDAC 2.8 SP1 out there, which is
quite disappointed)
Can anyone give me a hand ?
Thanks for anyone's kind help in advance ... Eric
Sorry, I forget to mention my environment.
Our server is running Win2000 Std Server (English) with SP3.
"Eric Fung" <Pls type eric.fung plus @.hld.com> bl
news:uQ$IZf0PFHA.244@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl g...
> Dear all,
> After our team has upgraded backup software of one server to "Veritas
> BackupExec 9.1",
> We found our routine SQL backup jobs (as part of our maintenance plan)
fail
> on it.
> From our investigation, we suspect it is caused by the MDAC 2.8 installed
> with BackupExec 9.1
> The problem seems already documented in microsoft support article :
> http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;827452
> However, as our company has not join MS support service, I have no formal
> channel
> to receive hot fix for the MDAC.
> (Actually the article suggest to update dbnmpntw.dll to a version after
> 09-17-2003 (2000.85.1022.42),
> but it is already 2 years but still no MDAC 2.8 SP1 out there, which
is
> quite disappointed)
> Can anyone give me a hand ?
> Thanks for anyone's kind help in advance ... Eric
>
|||Eric wrote on Tue, 12 Apr 2005 18:10:10 +0800:
> However, as our company has not join MS support service, I have no formal
> channel
> to receive hot fix for the MDAC.
You don't need to "join" the support service. Just ring the service number
for your country, explain the issue, and they send you a location to
download the fix from and a password to access the download. So long as it's
an issue covered by the article that requires a file(s) from MS support they
won't charge.
Dan
|||Dear Daniel,
Thanks a lot for your advice, I will try.
Eric
"Daniel Crichton" <msnews@.worldofspack.co.uk> bl
news:udnoPP3PFHA.2584@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl g...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Eric wrote on Tue, 12 Apr 2005 18:10:10 +0800:
formal
> You don't need to "join" the support service. Just ring the service number
> for your country, explain the issue, and they send you a location to
> download the fix from and a password to access the download. So long as
it's
> an issue covered by the article that requires a file(s) from MS support
they
> won't charge.
> Dan
>
MDAC 2.8 seems cause SQL backup fail, can anyone send us a MDAC 2.8 latest hotfix ?
Dear all,
After our team has upgraded backup software of one server to "Veritas
BackupExec 9.1",
We found our routine SQL backup jobs (as part of our maintenance plan) fail
on it.
From our investigation, we suspect it is caused by the MDAC 2.8 installed
with BackupExec 9.1
The problem seems already documented in microsoft support article :
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;827452
However, as our company has not join MS support service, I have no formal
channel
to receive hot fix for the MDAC.
(Actually the article suggest to update dbnmpntw.dll to a version after
09-17-2003 (2000.85.1022.42),
but it is already 2 years but still no MDAC 2.8 SP1 out there, which is
quite disappointed)
Can anyone give me a hand ?
Thanks for anyone's kind help in advance ... EricSorry, I forget to mention my environment.
Our server is running Win2000 Std Server (English) with SP3.
"Eric Fung" <Pls type eric.fung plus @.hld.com> ¦b¶l¥ó
news:uQ$IZf0PFHA.244@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl ¤¤¼¶¼g...
> Dear all,
> After our team has upgraded backup software of one server to "Veritas
> BackupExec 9.1",
> We found our routine SQL backup jobs (as part of our maintenance plan)
fail
> on it.
> From our investigation, we suspect it is caused by the MDAC 2.8 installed
> with BackupExec 9.1
> The problem seems already documented in microsoft support article :
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;827452
> However, as our company has not join MS support service, I have no formal
> channel
> to receive hot fix for the MDAC.
> (Actually the article suggest to update dbnmpntw.dll to a version after
> 09-17-2003 (2000.85.1022.42),
> but it is already 2 years but still no MDAC 2.8 SP1 out there, which
is
> quite disappointed)
> Can anyone give me a hand ?
> Thanks for anyone's kind help in advance ... Eric
>|||Eric wrote on Tue, 12 Apr 2005 18:10:10 +0800:
> However, as our company has not join MS support service, I have no formal
> channel
> to receive hot fix for the MDAC.
You don't need to "join" the support service. Just ring the service number
for your country, explain the issue, and they send you a location to
download the fix from and a password to access the download. So long as it's
an issue covered by the article that requires a file(s) from MS support they
won't charge.
Dan|||Dear Daniel,
Thanks a lot for your advice, I will try.
Eric
"Daniel Crichton" <msnews@.worldofspack.co.uk> ¦b¶l¥ó
news:udnoPP3PFHA.2584@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl ¤¤¼¶¼g...
> Eric wrote on Tue, 12 Apr 2005 18:10:10 +0800:
> > However, as our company has not join MS support service, I have no
formal
> > channel
> > to receive hot fix for the MDAC.
> You don't need to "join" the support service. Just ring the service number
> for your country, explain the issue, and they send you a location to
> download the fix from and a password to access the download. So long as
it's
> an issue covered by the article that requires a file(s) from MS support
they
> won't charge.
> Dan
>
After our team has upgraded backup software of one server to "Veritas
BackupExec 9.1",
We found our routine SQL backup jobs (as part of our maintenance plan) fail
on it.
From our investigation, we suspect it is caused by the MDAC 2.8 installed
with BackupExec 9.1
The problem seems already documented in microsoft support article :
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;827452
However, as our company has not join MS support service, I have no formal
channel
to receive hot fix for the MDAC.
(Actually the article suggest to update dbnmpntw.dll to a version after
09-17-2003 (2000.85.1022.42),
but it is already 2 years but still no MDAC 2.8 SP1 out there, which is
quite disappointed)
Can anyone give me a hand ?
Thanks for anyone's kind help in advance ... EricSorry, I forget to mention my environment.
Our server is running Win2000 Std Server (English) with SP3.
"Eric Fung" <Pls type eric.fung plus @.hld.com> ¦b¶l¥ó
news:uQ$IZf0PFHA.244@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl ¤¤¼¶¼g...
> Dear all,
> After our team has upgraded backup software of one server to "Veritas
> BackupExec 9.1",
> We found our routine SQL backup jobs (as part of our maintenance plan)
fail
> on it.
> From our investigation, we suspect it is caused by the MDAC 2.8 installed
> with BackupExec 9.1
> The problem seems already documented in microsoft support article :
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;827452
> However, as our company has not join MS support service, I have no formal
> channel
> to receive hot fix for the MDAC.
> (Actually the article suggest to update dbnmpntw.dll to a version after
> 09-17-2003 (2000.85.1022.42),
> but it is already 2 years but still no MDAC 2.8 SP1 out there, which
is
> quite disappointed)
> Can anyone give me a hand ?
> Thanks for anyone's kind help in advance ... Eric
>|||Eric wrote on Tue, 12 Apr 2005 18:10:10 +0800:
> However, as our company has not join MS support service, I have no formal
> channel
> to receive hot fix for the MDAC.
You don't need to "join" the support service. Just ring the service number
for your country, explain the issue, and they send you a location to
download the fix from and a password to access the download. So long as it's
an issue covered by the article that requires a file(s) from MS support they
won't charge.
Dan|||Dear Daniel,
Thanks a lot for your advice, I will try.
Eric
"Daniel Crichton" <msnews@.worldofspack.co.uk> ¦b¶l¥ó
news:udnoPP3PFHA.2584@.TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl ¤¤¼¶¼g...
> Eric wrote on Tue, 12 Apr 2005 18:10:10 +0800:
> > However, as our company has not join MS support service, I have no
formal
> > channel
> > to receive hot fix for the MDAC.
> You don't need to "join" the support service. Just ring the service number
> for your country, explain the issue, and they send you a location to
> download the fix from and a password to access the download. So long as
it's
> an issue covered by the article that requires a file(s) from MS support
they
> won't charge.
> Dan
>
Friday, March 23, 2012
McAfee VirusScan vs MS SQL Server 2000?
Hello, all!
I wonder if anybody here has anything to say about my planning to
install the latest version of McAfee's anti-virus software, VirusScan,
on a Windows 2003 Standard server, running MS SQL Server 2000 (with the
latest patches).
I've read that some have reported problems with VirusScan when they're
running Banyan Vines, but this is strictly TCP/IP.
If you have any recommendations or warnings to give me about this, I
would really like to hear it.
Sincerely,
NiklasCheck the following article, while it does not mention McAfee specifically
it gives some general suggestions for antivirus software on SQL Servers:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;309422
Simon
This posting is provided "as is" with no warranties and confers no rights.
"Niklas" <npivic@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1109598431.924015.13650@.o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Hello, all!
> I wonder if anybody here has anything to say about my planning to
> install the latest version of McAfee's anti-virus software, VirusScan,
> on a Windows 2003 Standard server, running MS SQL Server 2000 (with the
> latest patches).
> I've read that some have reported problems with VirusScan when they're
> running Banyan Vines, but this is strictly TCP/IP.
> If you have any recommendations or warnings to give me about this, I
> would really like to hear it.
> Sincerely,
>
> Niklas
>|||I just got out of the same fight with our server team and ended up having to
have a third-level tech representative conference in with us. Our concerns
where justified by the vendor.
Limit the Active Screening and Passive Scanning to exclude the data, log,
and database backup files.
If you are inside your LAN/WAN, you should not be runing inbound email nor
should you be using any network shares on a dedicated SQL Server
installation. In this case, there would be very little risk to virus attack
on the server.
Sincerely,
Anthony Thomas
"Simon Lidberg [MSFT]" <simonlid@.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:utOgFidHFHA.904@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
Check the following article, while it does not mention McAfee specifically
it gives some general suggestions for antivirus software on SQL Servers:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;309422
Simon
This posting is provided "as is" with no warranties and confers no rights.
"Niklas" <npivic@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1109598431.924015.13650@.o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Hello, all!
> I wonder if anybody here has anything to say about my planning to
> install the latest version of McAfee's anti-virus software, VirusScan,
> on a Windows 2003 Standard server, running MS SQL Server 2000 (with the
> latest patches).
> I've read that some have reported problems with VirusScan when they're
> running Banyan Vines, but this is strictly TCP/IP.
> If you have any recommendations or warnings to give me about this, I
> would really like to hear it.
> Sincerely,
>
> Niklas
>|||Thank you, both Simon and Anthony. You've provided me with good info,
and the URL to the recommendations from Microsoft hands me a solid base
for further internal discussions on this matter.
Sincerely,
Niklas
I wonder if anybody here has anything to say about my planning to
install the latest version of McAfee's anti-virus software, VirusScan,
on a Windows 2003 Standard server, running MS SQL Server 2000 (with the
latest patches).
I've read that some have reported problems with VirusScan when they're
running Banyan Vines, but this is strictly TCP/IP.
If you have any recommendations or warnings to give me about this, I
would really like to hear it.
Sincerely,
NiklasCheck the following article, while it does not mention McAfee specifically
it gives some general suggestions for antivirus software on SQL Servers:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;309422
Simon
This posting is provided "as is" with no warranties and confers no rights.
"Niklas" <npivic@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1109598431.924015.13650@.o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Hello, all!
> I wonder if anybody here has anything to say about my planning to
> install the latest version of McAfee's anti-virus software, VirusScan,
> on a Windows 2003 Standard server, running MS SQL Server 2000 (with the
> latest patches).
> I've read that some have reported problems with VirusScan when they're
> running Banyan Vines, but this is strictly TCP/IP.
> If you have any recommendations or warnings to give me about this, I
> would really like to hear it.
> Sincerely,
>
> Niklas
>|||I just got out of the same fight with our server team and ended up having to
have a third-level tech representative conference in with us. Our concerns
where justified by the vendor.
Limit the Active Screening and Passive Scanning to exclude the data, log,
and database backup files.
If you are inside your LAN/WAN, you should not be runing inbound email nor
should you be using any network shares on a dedicated SQL Server
installation. In this case, there would be very little risk to virus attack
on the server.
Sincerely,
Anthony Thomas
"Simon Lidberg [MSFT]" <simonlid@.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:utOgFidHFHA.904@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
Check the following article, while it does not mention McAfee specifically
it gives some general suggestions for antivirus software on SQL Servers:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;309422
Simon
This posting is provided "as is" with no warranties and confers no rights.
"Niklas" <npivic@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1109598431.924015.13650@.o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Hello, all!
> I wonder if anybody here has anything to say about my planning to
> install the latest version of McAfee's anti-virus software, VirusScan,
> on a Windows 2003 Standard server, running MS SQL Server 2000 (with the
> latest patches).
> I've read that some have reported problems with VirusScan when they're
> running Banyan Vines, but this is strictly TCP/IP.
> If you have any recommendations or warnings to give me about this, I
> would really like to hear it.
> Sincerely,
>
> Niklas
>|||Thank you, both Simon and Anthony. You've provided me with good info,
and the URL to the recommendations from Microsoft hands me a solid base
for further internal discussions on this matter.
Sincerely,
Niklas
McAfee VirusScan vs MS SQL Server 2000?
Hello, all!
I wonder if anybody here has anything to say about my planning to
install the latest version of McAfee's anti-virus software, VirusScan,
on a Windows 2003 Standard server, running MS SQL Server 2000 (with the
latest patches).
I've read that some have reported problems with VirusScan when they're
running Banyan Vines, but this is strictly TCP/IP.
If you have any recommendations or warnings to give me about this, I
would really like to hear it.
Sincerely,
NiklasCheck the following article, while it does not mention McAfee specifically
it gives some general suggestions for antivirus software on SQL Servers:
http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...kb;en-us;309422
Simon
This posting is provided "as is" with no warranties and confers no rights.
"Niklas" <npivic@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1109598431.924015.13650@.o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Hello, all!
> I wonder if anybody here has anything to say about my planning to
> install the latest version of McAfee's anti-virus software, VirusScan,
> on a Windows 2003 Standard server, running MS SQL Server 2000 (with the
> latest patches).
> I've read that some have reported problems with VirusScan when they're
> running Banyan Vines, but this is strictly TCP/IP.
> If you have any recommendations or warnings to give me about this, I
> would really like to hear it.
> Sincerely,
>
> Niklas
>|||I just got out of the same fight with our server team and ended up having to
have a third-level tech representative conference in with us. Our concerns
where justified by the vendor.
Limit the Active Screening and Passive Scanning to exclude the data, log,
and database backup files.
If you are inside your LAN/WAN, you should not be runing inbound email nor
should you be using any network shares on a dedicated SQL Server
installation. In this case, there would be very little risk to virus attack
on the server.
Sincerely,
Anthony Thomas
"Simon Lidberg [MSFT]" <simonlid@.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:utOgFidHFHA.904@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
Check the following article, while it does not mention McAfee specifically
it gives some general suggestions for antivirus software on SQL Servers:
http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...kb;en-us;309422
Simon
This posting is provided "as is" with no warranties and confers no rights.
"Niklas" <npivic@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1109598431.924015.13650@.o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Hello, all!
> I wonder if anybody here has anything to say about my planning to
> install the latest version of McAfee's anti-virus software, VirusScan,
> on a Windows 2003 Standard server, running MS SQL Server 2000 (with the
> latest patches).
> I've read that some have reported problems with VirusScan when they're
> running Banyan Vines, but this is strictly TCP/IP.
> If you have any recommendations or warnings to give me about this, I
> would really like to hear it.
> Sincerely,
>
> Niklas
>|||Thank you, both Simon and Anthony. You've provided me with good info,
and the URL to the recommendations from Microsoft hands me a solid base
for further internal discussions on this matter.
Sincerely,
Niklas
I wonder if anybody here has anything to say about my planning to
install the latest version of McAfee's anti-virus software, VirusScan,
on a Windows 2003 Standard server, running MS SQL Server 2000 (with the
latest patches).
I've read that some have reported problems with VirusScan when they're
running Banyan Vines, but this is strictly TCP/IP.
If you have any recommendations or warnings to give me about this, I
would really like to hear it.
Sincerely,
NiklasCheck the following article, while it does not mention McAfee specifically
it gives some general suggestions for antivirus software on SQL Servers:
http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...kb;en-us;309422
Simon
This posting is provided "as is" with no warranties and confers no rights.
"Niklas" <npivic@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1109598431.924015.13650@.o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Hello, all!
> I wonder if anybody here has anything to say about my planning to
> install the latest version of McAfee's anti-virus software, VirusScan,
> on a Windows 2003 Standard server, running MS SQL Server 2000 (with the
> latest patches).
> I've read that some have reported problems with VirusScan when they're
> running Banyan Vines, but this is strictly TCP/IP.
> If you have any recommendations or warnings to give me about this, I
> would really like to hear it.
> Sincerely,
>
> Niklas
>|||I just got out of the same fight with our server team and ended up having to
have a third-level tech representative conference in with us. Our concerns
where justified by the vendor.
Limit the Active Screening and Passive Scanning to exclude the data, log,
and database backup files.
If you are inside your LAN/WAN, you should not be runing inbound email nor
should you be using any network shares on a dedicated SQL Server
installation. In this case, there would be very little risk to virus attack
on the server.
Sincerely,
Anthony Thomas
"Simon Lidberg [MSFT]" <simonlid@.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:utOgFidHFHA.904@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
Check the following article, while it does not mention McAfee specifically
it gives some general suggestions for antivirus software on SQL Servers:
http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...kb;en-us;309422
Simon
This posting is provided "as is" with no warranties and confers no rights.
"Niklas" <npivic@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1109598431.924015.13650@.o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Hello, all!
> I wonder if anybody here has anything to say about my planning to
> install the latest version of McAfee's anti-virus software, VirusScan,
> on a Windows 2003 Standard server, running MS SQL Server 2000 (with the
> latest patches).
> I've read that some have reported problems with VirusScan when they're
> running Banyan Vines, but this is strictly TCP/IP.
> If you have any recommendations or warnings to give me about this, I
> would really like to hear it.
> Sincerely,
>
> Niklas
>|||Thank you, both Simon and Anthony. You've provided me with good info,
and the URL to the recommendations from Microsoft hands me a solid base
for further internal discussions on this matter.
Sincerely,
Niklas
McAfee VirusScan vs MS SQL Server 2000?
Hello, all!
I wonder if anybody here has anything to say about my planning to
install the latest version of McAfee's anti-virus software, VirusScan,
on a Windows 2003 Standard server, running MS SQL Server 2000 (with the
latest patches).
I've read that some have reported problems with VirusScan when they're
running Banyan Vines, but this is strictly TCP/IP.
If you have any recommendations or warnings to give me about this, I
would really like to hear it.
Sincerely,
Niklas
Check the following article, while it does not mention McAfee specifically
it gives some general suggestions for antivirus software on SQL Servers:
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;309422
Simon
This posting is provided "as is" with no warranties and confers no rights.
"Niklas" <npivic@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1109598431.924015.13650@.o13g2000cwo.googlegro ups.com...
> Hello, all!
> I wonder if anybody here has anything to say about my planning to
> install the latest version of McAfee's anti-virus software, VirusScan,
> on a Windows 2003 Standard server, running MS SQL Server 2000 (with the
> latest patches).
> I've read that some have reported problems with VirusScan when they're
> running Banyan Vines, but this is strictly TCP/IP.
> If you have any recommendations or warnings to give me about this, I
> would really like to hear it.
> Sincerely,
>
> Niklas
>
|||I just got out of the same fight with our server team and ended up having to
have a third-level tech representative conference in with us. Our concerns
where justified by the vendor.
Limit the Active Screening and Passive Scanning to exclude the data, log,
and database backup files.
If you are inside your LAN/WAN, you should not be runing inbound email nor
should you be using any network shares on a dedicated SQL Server
installation. In this case, there would be very little risk to virus attack
on the server.
Sincerely,
Anthony Thomas
"Simon Lidberg [MSFT]" <simonlid@.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:utOgFidHFHA.904@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
Check the following article, while it does not mention McAfee specifically
it gives some general suggestions for antivirus software on SQL Servers:
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;309422
Simon
This posting is provided "as is" with no warranties and confers no rights.
"Niklas" <npivic@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1109598431.924015.13650@.o13g2000cwo.googlegro ups.com...
> Hello, all!
> I wonder if anybody here has anything to say about my planning to
> install the latest version of McAfee's anti-virus software, VirusScan,
> on a Windows 2003 Standard server, running MS SQL Server 2000 (with the
> latest patches).
> I've read that some have reported problems with VirusScan when they're
> running Banyan Vines, but this is strictly TCP/IP.
> If you have any recommendations or warnings to give me about this, I
> would really like to hear it.
> Sincerely,
>
> Niklas
>
|||Thank you, both Simon and Anthony. You've provided me with good info,
and the URL to the recommendations from Microsoft hands me a solid base
for further internal discussions on this matter.
Sincerely,
Niklas
sql
I wonder if anybody here has anything to say about my planning to
install the latest version of McAfee's anti-virus software, VirusScan,
on a Windows 2003 Standard server, running MS SQL Server 2000 (with the
latest patches).
I've read that some have reported problems with VirusScan when they're
running Banyan Vines, but this is strictly TCP/IP.
If you have any recommendations or warnings to give me about this, I
would really like to hear it.
Sincerely,
Niklas
Check the following article, while it does not mention McAfee specifically
it gives some general suggestions for antivirus software on SQL Servers:
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;309422
Simon
This posting is provided "as is" with no warranties and confers no rights.
"Niklas" <npivic@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1109598431.924015.13650@.o13g2000cwo.googlegro ups.com...
> Hello, all!
> I wonder if anybody here has anything to say about my planning to
> install the latest version of McAfee's anti-virus software, VirusScan,
> on a Windows 2003 Standard server, running MS SQL Server 2000 (with the
> latest patches).
> I've read that some have reported problems with VirusScan when they're
> running Banyan Vines, but this is strictly TCP/IP.
> If you have any recommendations or warnings to give me about this, I
> would really like to hear it.
> Sincerely,
>
> Niklas
>
|||I just got out of the same fight with our server team and ended up having to
have a third-level tech representative conference in with us. Our concerns
where justified by the vendor.
Limit the Active Screening and Passive Scanning to exclude the data, log,
and database backup files.
If you are inside your LAN/WAN, you should not be runing inbound email nor
should you be using any network shares on a dedicated SQL Server
installation. In this case, there would be very little risk to virus attack
on the server.
Sincerely,
Anthony Thomas
"Simon Lidberg [MSFT]" <simonlid@.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:utOgFidHFHA.904@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
Check the following article, while it does not mention McAfee specifically
it gives some general suggestions for antivirus software on SQL Servers:
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;309422
Simon
This posting is provided "as is" with no warranties and confers no rights.
"Niklas" <npivic@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1109598431.924015.13650@.o13g2000cwo.googlegro ups.com...
> Hello, all!
> I wonder if anybody here has anything to say about my planning to
> install the latest version of McAfee's anti-virus software, VirusScan,
> on a Windows 2003 Standard server, running MS SQL Server 2000 (with the
> latest patches).
> I've read that some have reported problems with VirusScan when they're
> running Banyan Vines, but this is strictly TCP/IP.
> If you have any recommendations or warnings to give me about this, I
> would really like to hear it.
> Sincerely,
>
> Niklas
>
|||Thank you, both Simon and Anthony. You've provided me with good info,
and the URL to the recommendations from Microsoft hands me a solid base
for further internal discussions on this matter.
Sincerely,
Niklas
sql
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)