Showing posts with label reports. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reports. Show all posts

Friday, March 30, 2012

MDAC upgrade problem CompCheck reports 2.5 instead of 2.8

I am running SQL server on a Windows 2000 server with sp4 installed. After installing SQL service pack 4 on the machine my applications began complaining that MDAC was version 2.5 sure enough CompChecker reports version 2.5. I have tried to install the latest version of MDAC (2.8) on the machine but no matter what I do CompChecker reports 2.5.

I've tried reinstalling the SQL service pack I had no luck with that. Any help with this issue would be greatly appreciated.

WHen was the Windows service pack4 was applied, is it after SQL SP4 or before?

Check this KBA http://support.microsoft.com/kb/823939 for informaiton, ifyou need then you have to install MDAC 2.8 seperately.

|||The service pack was applied before the upgrade.|||I don't know if this helps but I think the issue is with the Windows File Protection. If I attempt to rename one of the dlls the server will automatically replace the file on the server with the 2.5 version. Is there some way to overcome this?|||Did you try to install the MDAC 2.8 separately like Satya proposed ? The file cannot be changed as the Windows FileProtextion is enabled for them (as you already noticed). if you already tried to install the MDAC 2.8, did you get an error or did the install run through ? Did you restart the system afterwards ?

HTH, Jens K. Suessmeyer.


http://www.sqlserver2005.de

|||

I finally figured this out. It turns out that there were certain registry settings that were incorrectly set when SP4 was applied to SQL Server 2000. I don't want to get into the exact registry settings that need to be changed but that is where the answer lies.

Thanks to all for your assistance.

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

MDAC Madness

Greetings,
On my Windows 2000 SP4 Server, the MDAC Component Checker Version 2.0
reports that MDAC 2.8 SP1 on Windows XP SP2 is installed.
MDAC 2.8 SP1 on Windows XP SP2 ... but this is a Windows 2000 SP4
server? Very confusing. Will someone help me get my head around this?
Further, when I set the Component Checker to perform analysis against a
selected version, and target MDAC 2.8 SP1 on Windows XP SP2, only one
inconsistency is reported -- msxml3.dll is at version 8.70.1104.0, but
8.50.2162.0 is expected. Is this also anything to be concerned about?
Thanks,
Tim ==Tim,
You don't mention the level of SQL2000 that you are running? Is it SP4?
Chris Wood
<tim@.tcsys.com> wrote in message
news:1123081469.455549.23850@.f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Greetings,
> On my Windows 2000 SP4 Server, the MDAC Component Checker Version 2.0
> reports that MDAC 2.8 SP1 on Windows XP SP2 is installed.
> MDAC 2.8 SP1 on Windows XP SP2 ... but this is a Windows 2000 SP4
> server? Very confusing. Will someone help me get my head around this?
> Further, when I set the Component Checker to perform analysis against a
> selected version, and target MDAC 2.8 SP1 on Windows XP SP2, only one
> inconsistency is reported -- msxml3.dll is at version 8.70.1104.0, but
> 8.50.2162.0 is expected. Is this also anything to be concerned about?
> Thanks,
> Tim ==>|||Thanks for replying, Chris.
I know almost nothing about SQL server, but, that being said, I'm an
otherwise competent MS net admin.
This particular box has an MSDE engine installed by an not-profit
financial application. The management of this app is hands-off, under
the control of the vendor.
The thing is, the same server is also our Backup Exec box. Backup Exec
was configured to use the same SQL instance as the financial app.
That's not unusual; the use of an existing SQL or MSDE instance on the
same box is the default installation setting for Backup Exec.
But lately we've been having some trouble with Backup Exec. And
wouldn't you know it? Some mismatched MDAC files turned up in the
course of investigation, and now Veritas/Symantec technical support is
insisting upon having the information in the OP before proceeding
further with the case.
So to answer your question: Knowing that this is an MSDE installation,
I was able to Google up this command line...
osql.exe -U administrator -Q "USE master SELECT @.@.version" -p
...but I'm prompted for a password which I do not believe that I
posses.
I've tried running it with the local administrator account and the
domain administrator account. No luck.
Believe me, your continued assistance is appreciated!|||Tim,
If you are using an Windows administrator id I think that use can use the -E
rather than -U parameter. This should not ask for a password.
From the MSDE SP4 readme
1.5 Verify the Version of Microsoft Data Access Components
MSDE 2000 SP4 setup determines whether to upgrade an installed version of
Microsoft Data Access Components (MDAC) to MDAC 2.8 SP1:
a.. Computers that run Windows 2000 are upgraded to MDAC 2.8 SP1.
b.. Computers that run Windows XP or Windows Server 2003 are not upgraded
to MDAC 2.8 SP1. If your system requires any of the fixes included in MDAC
2.8 SP1, upgrade your system to Windows XP SP2 or Windows Server 2003 SP1 to
obtain MDAC 2.8 SP2.
c.. MDAC 2.8 SP1 is not installed on computers that already have installed
an equal or later version of MDAC.
d..
e.. 1.6 Identify the Current Version of MSDE 2000
Before running Setup, identify the version of the MSDE 2000 instance that
is being upgraded. If the version of MSDE 2000 is already at or greater than
SP4, you do not need to install SP4.
To identify the installed version of MSDE 2000:
1.. Execute one of the following queries against an instance of the
database engine by using isql, osql, or Query Analyzer.
a.. SELECT SERVERPROPERTY('ProductLevel')
b.. SELECT @.@.VERSION
c.. SELECT SERVERPROPERTY('ProductVersion')
2.. Find out your version of MSDE by means of the following table. SQL
Server 2000 Version and Level @.@.VERSION Product Level
SQL Server 2000 Original Release 8.00.194 RTM
Desktop Engine SP1 8.00.384 SP1
Desktop Engine SP2 8.00.534 SP2
Desktop Engine SP3, SP3a, or MSDE 2000 Release A. 8.00.760 SP3
MSDE 2000 SP4 8.00.2039 SP4
Chris
<tim@.tcsys.com> wrote in message
news:1123100308.823774.310400@.g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Thanks for replying, Chris.
> I know almost nothing about SQL server, but, that being said, I'm an
> otherwise competent MS net admin.
> This particular box has an MSDE engine installed by an not-profit
> financial application. The management of this app is hands-off, under
> the control of the vendor.
> The thing is, the same server is also our Backup Exec box. Backup Exec
> was configured to use the same SQL instance as the financial app.
> That's not unusual; the use of an existing SQL or MSDE instance on the
> same box is the default installation setting for Backup Exec.
> But lately we've been having some trouble with Backup Exec. And
> wouldn't you know it? Some mismatched MDAC files turned up in the
> course of investigation, and now Veritas/Symantec technical support is
> insisting upon having the information in the OP before proceeding
> further with the case.
> So to answer your question: Knowing that this is an MSDE installation,
> I was able to Google up this command line...
> osql.exe -U administrator -Q "USE master SELECT @.@.version" -p
> ...but I'm prompted for a password which I do not believe that I
> posses.
> I've tried running it with the local administrator account and the
> domain administrator account. No luck.
> Believe me, your continued assistance is appreciated!
>|||Tim,
Did you find out the build of MSDE?
Chris
<tim@.tcsys.com> wrote in message
news:1123100308.823774.310400@.g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Thanks for replying, Chris.
> I know almost nothing about SQL server, but, that being said, I'm an
> otherwise competent MS net admin.
> This particular box has an MSDE engine installed by an not-profit
> financial application. The management of this app is hands-off, under
> the control of the vendor.
> The thing is, the same server is also our Backup Exec box. Backup Exec
> was configured to use the same SQL instance as the financial app.
> That's not unusual; the use of an existing SQL or MSDE instance on the
> same box is the default installation setting for Backup Exec.
> But lately we've been having some trouble with Backup Exec. And
> wouldn't you know it? Some mismatched MDAC files turned up in the
> course of investigation, and now Veritas/Symantec technical support is
> insisting upon having the information in the OP before proceeding
> further with the case.
> So to answer your question: Knowing that this is an MSDE installation,
> I was able to Google up this command line...
> osql.exe -U administrator -Q "USE master SELECT @.@.version" -p
> ...but I'm prompted for a password which I do not believe that I
> posses.
> I've tried running it with the local administrator account and the
> domain administrator account. No luck.
> Believe me, your continued assistance is appreciated!
>|||Chris,
This thread speaks to a problem I created on our SBS 2003 with MDAC now
having 5 mismatched file versions and a crippled Veritas BackupExec 10, not
to mention the other problems this MDAC issue is causing. I lost RAS
yesterday (related? who knows!) and I can no longer access our Exchange
Server through the Web access for Outlook 2003.
I really messed things up and need help to get the correct MDAC files
restored. I used the cc.exe. Component Checker from MS to test the installed
version against the expected file versions.
Veritas/Symantec will not proceed with assistance until I get MDAC fixed.
HELP!
Chris
"Chris Wood" wrote:
> Tim,
> If you are using an Windows administrator id I think that use can use the -E
> rather than -U parameter. This should not ask for a password.
> From the MSDE SP4 readme
> 1.5 Verify the Version of Microsoft Data Access Components
> MSDE 2000 SP4 setup determines whether to upgrade an installed version of
> Microsoft Data Access Components (MDAC) to MDAC 2.8 SP1:
> a.. Computers that run Windows 2000 are upgraded to MDAC 2.8 SP1.
>
> b.. Computers that run Windows XP or Windows Server 2003 are not upgraded
> to MDAC 2.8 SP1. If your system requires any of the fixes included in MDAC
> 2.8 SP1, upgrade your system to Windows XP SP2 or Windows Server 2003 SP1 to
> obtain MDAC 2.8 SP2.
>
> c.. MDAC 2.8 SP1 is not installed on computers that already have installed
> an equal or later version of MDAC.
> d..
> e.. 1.6 Identify the Current Version of MSDE 2000
> Before running Setup, identify the version of the MSDE 2000 instance that
> is being upgraded. If the version of MSDE 2000 is already at or greater than
> SP4, you do not need to install SP4.
> To identify the installed version of MSDE 2000:
> 1.. Execute one of the following queries against an instance of the
> database engine by using isql, osql, or Query Analyzer.
> a.. SELECT SERVERPROPERTY('ProductLevel')
>
> b.. SELECT @.@.VERSION
>
> c.. SELECT SERVERPROPERTY('ProductVersion')
> 2.. Find out your version of MSDE by means of the following table. SQL
> Server 2000 Version and Level @.@.VERSION Product Level
> SQL Server 2000 Original Release 8.00.194 RTM
> Desktop Engine SP1 8.00.384 SP1
> Desktop Engine SP2 8.00.534 SP2
> Desktop Engine SP3, SP3a, or MSDE 2000 Release A. 8.00.760 SP3
> MSDE 2000 SP4 8.00.2039 SP4
> Chris
> <tim@.tcsys.com> wrote in message
> news:1123100308.823774.310400@.g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > Thanks for replying, Chris.
> >
> > I know almost nothing about SQL server, but, that being said, I'm an
> > otherwise competent MS net admin.
> >
> > This particular box has an MSDE engine installed by an not-profit
> > financial application. The management of this app is hands-off, under
> > the control of the vendor.
> >
> > The thing is, the same server is also our Backup Exec box. Backup Exec
> > was configured to use the same SQL instance as the financial app.
> > That's not unusual; the use of an existing SQL or MSDE instance on the
> > same box is the default installation setting for Backup Exec.
> >
> > But lately we've been having some trouble with Backup Exec. And
> > wouldn't you know it? Some mismatched MDAC files turned up in the
> > course of investigation, and now Veritas/Symantec technical support is
> > insisting upon having the information in the OP before proceeding
> > further with the case.
> >
> > So to answer your question: Knowing that this is an MSDE installation,
> > I was able to Google up this command line...
> > osql.exe -U administrator -Q "USE master SELECT @.@.version" -p
> > ...but I'm prompted for a password which I do not believe that I
> > posses.
> >
> > I've tried running it with the local administrator account and the
> > domain administrator account. No luck.
> >
> > Believe me, your continued assistance is appreciated!
> >
>
>|||Is this SBS 2003 SP1? It looks like it includes MSDE2000 SP4 unless you have
the Premium edition that includes full blown SQL2000 SP4.
If this is SP1 then my previous note about MDAC applies.
Chris
"Chris Williams" <Chris Williams@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:BE841E75-8D2C-4EE1-B2E7-D4BE9EAD417E@.microsoft.com...
> Chris,
> This thread speaks to a problem I created on our SBS 2003 with MDAC now
> having 5 mismatched file versions and a crippled Veritas BackupExec 10,
> not
> to mention the other problems this MDAC issue is causing. I lost RAS
> yesterday (related? who knows!) and I can no longer access our Exchange
> Server through the Web access for Outlook 2003.
> I really messed things up and need help to get the correct MDAC files
> restored. I used the cc.exe. Component Checker from MS to test the
> installed
> version against the expected file versions.
> Veritas/Symantec will not proceed with assistance until I get MDAC fixed.
> HELP!
> Chris
> "Chris Wood" wrote:
>> Tim,
>> If you are using an Windows administrator id I think that use can use
>> the -E
>> rather than -U parameter. This should not ask for a password.
>> From the MSDE SP4 readme
>> 1.5 Verify the Version of Microsoft Data Access Components
>> MSDE 2000 SP4 setup determines whether to upgrade an installed version of
>> Microsoft Data Access Components (MDAC) to MDAC 2.8 SP1:
>> a.. Computers that run Windows 2000 are upgraded to MDAC 2.8 SP1.
>>
>> b.. Computers that run Windows XP or Windows Server 2003 are not
>> upgraded
>> to MDAC 2.8 SP1. If your system requires any of the fixes included in
>> MDAC
>> 2.8 SP1, upgrade your system to Windows XP SP2 or Windows Server 2003 SP1
>> to
>> obtain MDAC 2.8 SP2.
>>
>> c.. MDAC 2.8 SP1 is not installed on computers that already have
>> installed
>> an equal or later version of MDAC.
>> d..
>> e.. 1.6 Identify the Current Version of MSDE 2000
>> Before running Setup, identify the version of the MSDE 2000 instance
>> that
>> is being upgraded. If the version of MSDE 2000 is already at or greater
>> than
>> SP4, you do not need to install SP4.
>> To identify the installed version of MSDE 2000:
>> 1.. Execute one of the following queries against an instance of the
>> database engine by using isql, osql, or Query Analyzer.
>> a.. SELECT SERVERPROPERTY('ProductLevel')
>>
>> b.. SELECT @.@.VERSION
>>
>> c.. SELECT SERVERPROPERTY('ProductVersion')
>> 2.. Find out your version of MSDE by means of the following table.
>> SQL
>> Server 2000 Version and Level @.@.VERSION Product Level
>> SQL Server 2000 Original Release 8.00.194 RTM
>> Desktop Engine SP1 8.00.384 SP1
>> Desktop Engine SP2 8.00.534 SP2
>> Desktop Engine SP3, SP3a, or MSDE 2000 Release A. 8.00.760 SP3
>> MSDE 2000 SP4 8.00.2039 SP4
>> Chris
>> <tim@.tcsys.com> wrote in message
>> news:1123100308.823774.310400@.g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> > Thanks for replying, Chris.
>> >
>> > I know almost nothing about SQL server, but, that being said, I'm an
>> > otherwise competent MS net admin.
>> >
>> > This particular box has an MSDE engine installed by an not-profit
>> > financial application. The management of this app is hands-off, under
>> > the control of the vendor.
>> >
>> > The thing is, the same server is also our Backup Exec box. Backup Exec
>> > was configured to use the same SQL instance as the financial app.
>> > That's not unusual; the use of an existing SQL or MSDE instance on the
>> > same box is the default installation setting for Backup Exec.
>> >
>> > But lately we've been having some trouble with Backup Exec. And
>> > wouldn't you know it? Some mismatched MDAC files turned up in the
>> > course of investigation, and now Veritas/Symantec technical support is
>> > insisting upon having the information in the OP before proceeding
>> > further with the case.
>> >
>> > So to answer your question: Knowing that this is an MSDE installation,
>> > I was able to Google up this command line...
>> > osql.exe -U administrator -Q "USE master SELECT @.@.version" -p
>> > ...but I'm prompted for a password which I do not believe that I
>> > posses.
>> >
>> > I've tried running it with the local administrator account and the
>> > domain administrator account. No luck.
>> >
>> > Believe me, your continued assistance is appreciated!
>> >
>>|||Chris (Wood),
Are you asking about my server issue or the one from Tim? We are not at SP1
for our SBS 2003 yet because the server would not allow Windows Update to
properly run much less update it's components. I have all 5 of the Microsoft
specified downloads for SBS 2003 SP1 downloaded as per an article I read on
the SBS MS site. I was planning to do some more reading on this before trying
to apply them and was hoping that would fix my browser issue that kept it
from running Windows Update properly.
Frankly this server was a walking abortion from the get go with the company
that originally installed it doing a very poor job. I band-aided everything I
could safely do to even get it to run without daily unexpected re-boots. I
know that was putting off the inevidable, but the company needed to get back
to daily operations after 30+ days of dissruption caused by this "other"
outside computer company. We have since severed ties with them.
Anyway, we are running with only the original installation of SBS 2003, some
security patches in place and not much else. I also wanted to update the
exchange server to SP1 (this is part of the process I hope to complete once I
fix my MDAC issues).
Since I last posted, I tossed in my towel on this and have a engineer coming
in this morning from a group that has been trying to get our business for
some time now. I hope he will know what to do to fix this MDAC problem.
But any input you can offer will be good. Also, we are running the standard
version of SBS 2003, not the premium, thus the SQL is only that MSDE2000,
which I am growing to hate by the minute. I would have ponyed up the money
for the premium if I where actually working here when they were forced to get
a new server back in December 2004. (The old server was a Netware server that
this same outside computer company supported, broke and then said it's better
to scrap that server and replace it with the SBS 2003 they installed - This
Machine. We all know how well a job they did on that too!)
Sorry to rant. It's been a long week and I am stressed out.
Chris W.
"Chris Wood" wrote:
> Is this SBS 2003 SP1? It looks like it includes MSDE2000 SP4 unless you have
> the Premium edition that includes full blown SQL2000 SP4.
> If this is SP1 then my previous note about MDAC applies.
> Chris
> "Chris Williams" <Chris Williams@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:BE841E75-8D2C-4EE1-B2E7-D4BE9EAD417E@.microsoft.com...
> > Chris,
> >
> > This thread speaks to a problem I created on our SBS 2003 with MDAC now
> > having 5 mismatched file versions and a crippled Veritas BackupExec 10,
> > not
> > to mention the other problems this MDAC issue is causing. I lost RAS
> > yesterday (related? who knows!) and I can no longer access our Exchange
> > Server through the Web access for Outlook 2003.
> >
> > I really messed things up and need help to get the correct MDAC files
> > restored. I used the cc.exe. Component Checker from MS to test the
> > installed
> > version against the expected file versions.
> >
> > Veritas/Symantec will not proceed with assistance until I get MDAC fixed.
> >
> > HELP!
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > "Chris Wood" wrote:
> >
> >> Tim,
> >>
> >> If you are using an Windows administrator id I think that use can use
> >> the -E
> >> rather than -U parameter. This should not ask for a password.
> >>
> >> From the MSDE SP4 readme
> >>
> >> 1.5 Verify the Version of Microsoft Data Access Components
> >> MSDE 2000 SP4 setup determines whether to upgrade an installed version of
> >> Microsoft Data Access Components (MDAC) to MDAC 2.8 SP1:
> >>
> >> a.. Computers that run Windows 2000 are upgraded to MDAC 2.8 SP1.
> >>
> >>
> >> b.. Computers that run Windows XP or Windows Server 2003 are not
> >> upgraded
> >> to MDAC 2.8 SP1. If your system requires any of the fixes included in
> >> MDAC
> >> 2.8 SP1, upgrade your system to Windows XP SP2 or Windows Server 2003 SP1
> >> to
> >> obtain MDAC 2.8 SP2.
> >>
> >>
> >> c.. MDAC 2.8 SP1 is not installed on computers that already have
> >> installed
> >> an equal or later version of MDAC.
> >> d..
> >> e.. 1.6 Identify the Current Version of MSDE 2000
> >> Before running Setup, identify the version of the MSDE 2000 instance
> >> that
> >> is being upgraded. If the version of MSDE 2000 is already at or greater
> >> than
> >> SP4, you do not need to install SP4.
> >>
> >> To identify the installed version of MSDE 2000:
> >>
> >> 1.. Execute one of the following queries against an instance of the
> >> database engine by using isql, osql, or Query Analyzer.
> >> a.. SELECT SERVERPROPERTY('ProductLevel')
> >>
> >>
> >> b.. SELECT @.@.VERSION
> >>
> >>
> >> c.. SELECT SERVERPROPERTY('ProductVersion')
> >> 2.. Find out your version of MSDE by means of the following table.
> >> SQL
> >> Server 2000 Version and Level @.@.VERSION Product Level
> >> SQL Server 2000 Original Release 8.00.194 RTM
> >> Desktop Engine SP1 8.00.384 SP1
> >> Desktop Engine SP2 8.00.534 SP2
> >> Desktop Engine SP3, SP3a, or MSDE 2000 Release A. 8.00.760 SP3
> >> MSDE 2000 SP4 8.00.2039 SP4
> >>
> >> Chris
> >> <tim@.tcsys.com> wrote in message
> >> news:1123100308.823774.310400@.g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> >> > Thanks for replying, Chris.
> >> >
> >> > I know almost nothing about SQL server, but, that being said, I'm an
> >> > otherwise competent MS net admin.
> >> >
> >> > This particular box has an MSDE engine installed by an not-profit
> >> > financial application. The management of this app is hands-off, under
> >> > the control of the vendor.
> >> >
> >> > The thing is, the same server is also our Backup Exec box. Backup Exec
> >> > was configured to use the same SQL instance as the financial app.
> >> > That's not unusual; the use of an existing SQL or MSDE instance on the
> >> > same box is the default installation setting for Backup Exec.
> >> >
> >> > But lately we've been having some trouble with Backup Exec. And
> >> > wouldn't you know it? Some mismatched MDAC files turned up in the
> >> > course of investigation, and now Veritas/Symantec technical support is
> >> > insisting upon having the information in the OP before proceeding
> >> > further with the case.
> >> >
> >> > So to answer your question: Knowing that this is an MSDE installation,
> >> > I was able to Google up this command line...
> >> > osql.exe -U administrator -Q "USE master SELECT @.@.version" -p
> >> > ...but I'm prompted for a password which I do not believe that I
> >> > posses.
> >> >
> >> > I've tried running it with the local administrator account and the
> >> > domain administrator account. No luck.
> >> >
> >> > Believe me, your continued assistance is appreciated!
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>sql

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

May I install Reporting Designer on XP

I'd like to trial Reporting Service 2000. But it couldn't install on XP
system.
How can I develop the reports on XP platform within VS 2003?
If I cannot, I have to reinstall my laptop. How sad it is!
Thanks & Regards,
John WangYou can definitely do this. I assume what you want to do is to have RS
server (the report designer is definitely not an issue) on XP. You have to
have a version of SQL Server 2000 installed (RS uses that) also you need to
have IIS running. By default IIS is not installed with XP and you have to
add/remove programs, windows (I believe) and add in IIS.
What you want to do is definitely possible.
Also, if the reports are to be deployed elsewhere then the problem is that
you tried to install the server portion of RS instead of just the client
tools.
Bruce Loehle-Conger
MVP SQL Server Reporting Services
"John Wang" <John Wang@.community.nospam> wrote in message
news:%23TNR9FZ3GHA.5000@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> I'd like to trial Reporting Service 2000. But it couldn't install on XP
> system.
> How can I develop the reports on XP platform within VS 2003?
> If I cannot, I have to reinstall my laptop. How sad it is!
> Thanks & Regards,
> John Wang
>|||Thank you a lot for your help.
I found that I was too impatient in last install process. I canceled the
installation process without the "next" button appeared after the warning
prompt. :)
I have completed the installation now. Thank you very much.
John Wang
"Bruce L-C [MVP]" <bruce_lcNOSPAM@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:e$VfhZZ3GHA.4364@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> You can definitely do this. I assume what you want to do is to have RS
> server (the report designer is definitely not an issue) on XP. You have to
> have a version of SQL Server 2000 installed (RS uses that) also you need
> to have IIS running. By default IIS is not installed with XP and you have
> to add/remove programs, windows (I believe) and add in IIS.
> What you want to do is definitely possible.
> Also, if the reports are to be deployed elsewhere then the problem is that
> you tried to install the server portion of RS instead of just the client
> tools.
>
> --
> Bruce Loehle-Conger
> MVP SQL Server Reporting Services
> "John Wang" <John Wang@.community.nospam> wrote in message
> news:%23TNR9FZ3GHA.5000@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> I'd like to trial Reporting Service 2000. But it couldn't install on XP
>> system.
>> How can I develop the reports on XP platform within VS 2003?
>> If I cannot, I have to reinstall my laptop. How sad it is!
>> Thanks & Regards,
>> John Wang
>

Monday, March 12, 2012

Maximum page width in Crystal Reports 8

Hi. I'm new to the forum. I apologize if this is the wrong place to pose such a question, or if it's been answered in another thread. I searched and did not find anything.

I don't want to bog everyone down in the details, but I want to give at least a little background as to the problem.

We use Crystal Reports 8.0.1 in conjunction with PeopleSoft Financials 8 to produce positive pay files out of our pay cycle process-which creates checks for vendors. The positive pay file includes basic check information-check number, date, etc. The pay cycle uses the Crystal Report definition, and creates a .txt positive pay file.

Due to new bank requirements, we now have to add several new fields to the file. The Crystal report designer doesn't seem capable of letting me go any further to the right than I already am. On print setup, I changed the layout to landscape, and the paper type to tabloid, and this definitely gave me some extra room. However, I still need about another 100 characters or so.

Does anyone know of any way to expand the page width further than I already have?

Help is much appreciated!Hi

I faced the same problem.. you can try to create a new custom paper size for your printer and change the designer printer setup paper size..
I failed to create a new paper size..
i would like to change the page header of the report also.. can anyone help?

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Maximum date calculation for all records

For Crystal Reports version 8.5, I need a report for last year's amounts and this year's amounts. My raw data looks like: fund-type, fund-id, customer-id, check amount, check date, last year's beginning date, last year's ending date, this year's beginning date, and this year's ending date. The beginning and ending dates are subject to change. Also, out of the 2,000 records in the raw data, about 5 of the records have the beginning and ending dates attached. I have used the summary calculation of Maximum to find the beginning and ending dates. My problem is that I cannot use the Maximum function in the formula fields to determine if a check is for last year or this year. I also need totals for a customer's checks (last year and this year), fund-id amounts (this year and last year), and fund-type (last year and this year). When I try to create running-totals, I receive the error message that the summary/running totals cannot be created. Is there a way to create this report?
Thank you for any and all help and advice,
TracySHCCreate a formula having the code

If year(datecol)<year(currentdate) then
1
else
2
Place it in details section
Now group the report by this formula and use summary accordingly